<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great Performance from FullFAT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.james.walms.co.uk/2008/11/17/great-performance-from-fullfat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.james.walms.co.uk/2008/11/17/great-performance-from-fullfat/</link>
	<description>James Walmsley&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.james.walms.co.uk/2008/11/17/great-performance-from-fullfat/comment-page-1/#comment-2319</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worm.me.uk/?p=143#comment-2319</guid>
		<description>Well there&#039;s no exact values on codesize, memory footprint, as I&#039;m still at an early stage of development.

I&#039;m constantly optimising my work in these areas, checking memory footprint etc. 

It will be very small.

FullFAT in its current state can utilise very little memory, or as much as can be made available to it.

There&#039;s a tiny memory manager, which handles buffers in a thread-safe way, the minimum memory this uses is 512 bytes, (1 block). Although I&#039;m not too sure how it will perform with such a constraint.

I shall add more details as soon as I can. Take a look around February for a release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there&#8217;s no exact values on codesize, memory footprint, as I&#8217;m still at an early stage of development.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m constantly optimising my work in these areas, checking memory footprint etc. </p>
<p>It will be very small.</p>
<p>FullFAT in its current state can utilise very little memory, or as much as can be made available to it.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a tiny memory manager, which handles buffers in a thread-safe way, the minimum memory this uses is 512 bytes, (1 block). Although I&#8217;m not too sure how it will perform with such a constraint.</p>
<p>I shall add more details as soon as I can. Take a look around February for a release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://blog.james.walms.co.uk/2008/11/17/great-performance-from-fullfat/comment-page-1/#comment-2310</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worm.me.uk/?p=143#comment-2310</guid>
		<description>Interesting work on the FAT16/FAT32 driver. Do you have any idea about codesize RAM/FLASH ?

Regards,
Mattias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting work on the FAT16/FAT32 driver. Do you have any idea about codesize RAM/FLASH ?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Mattias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
